Conference Realignment News, NCAA School Message Board Directory & Conference Realignment Forum Community

Why Villanova Needs to Upgrade & Join Big East

Sep
16
2010
By
Category: American Conference Expansion & Realignment, Big East Expansion & Realignment, Featured News, NCAA Division Upgrades

nova Why Villanova Needs to Upgrade & Join Big East

If you haven’t heard the rumblings of late, the Big East has reached out to FCS football school, Villanova, about joining the conference as it’s 9th member.

Villanova has no stadium capable of FBS level football. They could pay to lease out the new Philadelphia MLS stadium in the city that seats 18,500, and pay for temporary seating to expand the stadium on game days to the necessary 25,000 capacity. In adding the extra 27 scholarships to upgrade from the 63 in FCS to the 85 in FBS, Villanova would need to add another 27 scholarships for women’s sports in order to remain in NCAA Title IX compliance. So stadiums and scholarships are just two of the financial concerns for the school in what will be a long and expensive shopping list.

The transition from FCS to FBS would be extremely expensive, especially since Villanova is a small private school of 6500 undergraduates, tiny compared to the other Big East football schools which average 24,000 (7 state schools and 1 private school – Syracuse). The economy has been less than stellar, a poor time to expect high numbers of donations from an alumni base that is bound to have some former students in the current 15% American unemployment base.

But regardless of this huge economic mountain to climb, Villanova should jump at the opportunity.

The rationale is simple: if the invite is there now, take it, because nobody knows what the future holds for college conferences. Villanova rejected an invitation 13 years ago when the Big East extended a “one time” blanket upgrade offer to all it’s members the sponsored football at some level: if they wanted to upgrade, you’d be a full member of the Big East football conference. Uconn was the only school that accepted, as it was in a better position as a large state school that had a state government that had prepared a stadium plan just a few years earlier to lure the NFL New England Patriots team to Hartford. Villanova and Georgetown were the notable programs that passed on the offer.

The surprise of a Villanova invitation should be coming from fans of Big East football schools and college football fans in general. The Big East reaching out to Villanova is primarily to help secure the Philadelphia market for it’s football league. But it’s a huge risk to bring in a program that might never find a strong following in a professional sports town. Unlike many other cities that seem to have room for both professional and college sports, Philadelphia football has always been geared towards the NFL Eagles. State school Temple University was a member of the Big East (associate) but forced out due to lack of success and support. Fast forward since their expulsion, and the program has found success as a football member of the MAC and their fresh new digs via their lease with the NFL Eagles Lincoln Field.

There is a strong argument to be made that if the Big East wanted a Philadelphia presence, that bringing a now successful Temple team back in the fold would be a better move than adding Villanova. But even with their success, Philadelphia is still primarily a “Penn St. town”.

The Big East football schools have long clamored for a 9th football team to ease in scheduling. Ideally, they’d prefer 4 home games per school and 4 road games. But the 8 school dilemma does not afford all schools that equal balance. But in inviting Villanova, the Big East is looking past some quality candidates:

  • UCF:
    - Offers the Orlando market and strong penetration into that market.
    - The fastest growing school in the recruiting rich state of Florida with a total enrollment of 54000
    - Historically a stronger football program than many candidates
    - Newer stadium on par with the top Big East facilities
    - willingness to join for football only

  • Memphis:
    - Offers the Memphis market and unlike Villanova, the school has a stronger presence in the city (albeit primarily for basketball)
    - Entrance into the south, traditionally a stronger recruiting area of the country
    - sponsorship revenue by FedEx
    - potential to become a stronger football program due to it’s regional location
    - A good fit with former CUSA members Louisville, Cincinnati and USF

  • Temple:
    - Recent success under their new coach
    - A stronger current football share in the Philadelphia market
    - Lease of an NFL stadium
    - willingness to join for football only

  • ECU:
    - Further penetration into the south via the North Carolina school
    - a strong following, large school, with strong attendance numbers
    - willingness to join for football only
  • TCU:
    - recent football success with access to the BCS
    - offers access to the Dallas market
    - well funded athletic program with various stadium options at a given time
    - a private christian school
    - A good fit with former CUSA members Louisville, Cincinnati and USF

  • Houston:
    - recent football success
    - offers access to the Houston market
    - A good fit with former CUSA members Louisville, Cincinnati and USF

  • Villanova:
    - An FCS program requiring an FBS upgrade in the Philadelphia market
    - has no stadium
    - a small private school of 7000
    - already a member of the Big East

If you look at the candidates, it’s clear why one would question Villanovas inclusion in the expansion talks.

But it’s actually their last “qualification” that puts them ahead of all the other candidates: they are already in the Big East.

With Villanova already in the Big East, it means that the current 16 school hybrid does not need to expand. The balance would remain with 8 large state schools (with football) and 6 smaller private catholic schools for non-football sports, Notre Dame in for everything but football, and Villanova as the lone catholic/small school football program.

This seems to be the logic: if all we need is a 9th school, lets promote from within.

But a move by Villanova to the Big East for football, should come with some resentment from the non-BCS schools. It would be quite the slap in the face if the Big East, arguably the worst BCS conference, that already  has 2-4 less schools to split it’s revenue with, were permitted to add an FCS school that would be given access to the BCS revenue prior to established schools. Programs like TCU, Boise St., Utah and BYU, as well as other non-BCS programs that have ranked well ahead of Big East schools would be passed over in favor of an FCS school. So much for working hard to prove your worth and achieve your goals. The Big East would instead be giving a BCS conference opportunity to a school that might never succeed in FBS…while the schools that have succeeded have to continue to struggle.

But for Villanova, it’s an opportunity that they’d be silly to look past. If you were offered a job that would pay you tens of millions over time and you had a virtual lifetime contract, it’s worth the initial investment of moving your family, paying to build a house, and spending money to get your affairs in order.

Nothing is final yet and of course the Big East could still opt to invite Villanova and then expand further with schools like UCF down the road. But for Villanova, a Big East invitation is one they should jump on to accept.
The school is fortunate enough to be in the right spot at the right time. And even if there are other more qualified candidates, it’s not Villanova’s fault that they were fortunate enough to get an invitation.

And while the short term stability of the league looks fine with 16 total schools and 9 football programs (with Villanova), things can change. The Big East might still one day split with the football schools leaving for their own conference. And this is the side Villanova would want to be with. A 12 school all sports conference wil Uconn, Syracuse, Rutgers, Villanova, Pittsburgh, WVU, Cincinnati, Louisville, Memphis, UCF, USF and ECU/Temple/Houston/TCU would still be a stronger all-sports conference than the current Big East sixteen school hybrid. And it would be to Villanova’s benefit to be included with the first step being to upgrade now to the FBS.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)


Tags: , , , , , ,



Did You Enjoy This?
        8 

Comments

Related Articles:






Comments:



  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/07829911459870773896 Nathan Brice

    It was not a mistake to let Temple go given the state of the football program at the time of their departure. They have made tremendous strides since that happened. They play in an NFL stadium. They have been to a bowl game. The Big East is also not as good as when they left. The basketball program is also much improved with Fran Dunphy at the helm. The Big East needs to make several moves to avoid being raided again. This could be the first of those moves.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://openid.aol.com/lbto813 Lbto813

    or another radical idea altogether, is just for football season, to take just the top 8 afore mentioned westcoast teams (or 9), let them join with the big east as is (or + ECU or UCF) as a seperate division altogether, and rename it, just for the football conference;
    have the big east/big west as divisions within the first "semi-super" conference, made up of 16-18 teams…
    the "Big Coastal Conference" (BCC)
    Boise,
    TCU,
    Fresno,
    Houston,
    Nevada,
    BYU,
    Hawai'i,
    SDSU (for the so-cal marketing area)
    is for the most part a legitimate strong 8 (better then any are currently facing)
    (+ either or from AF, Wyo, UTEP, SMU, Tulsa to make 9)

    with 8, they could each play their 7 div. games each season, with 1 cross country game to help generate the "national media" hype and coverage mentioned by michael above… with 9, you play your 8 div. games with the conf. championship, or you could still go 7 and 1 each season, whatever…

    either way, that would CERTAINLY boost the credibility of not just the Big East's AQ status which as of late has been questioned time and time again, but also the AQ status of the said "western division" teams as well, as the end of the season, an actual championship game between the best from each, would determine the Champion, and who deserves that AQ slot… i like to idea of at least once a season everyone would get some guarunteed cross country exposure; games like, RU vs. Nevada, Pitt vs. Fresno, Cincy vs. Houston, Uconn vs. BYU… then at the end of each season, you'd have a big national game that reaches fan bases on both coasts, i.e. this year most likely; WVU vs. Boise… you tell me that whoever wins that matchup, both with NO losses (or just 1) up to that point within their own respective divisions in order to get there, a few FBS wins OOC as well, both therefor ranked nationally; doesn't deserve a national championship consideration for winning that conference + conf. championship game…

    ah, the ideas… what can i say, i'm a dreamer, and while i'm tired of hearing WAC and MWC schools cry for respect because their undefeated records, despite their weak in conf. schedules, i'd love to but all those best teams together to face off against each other, and see which ones win the tough games all season, and see who really deserves the respect each year without question… give 'em a shot… (but let's save the big east and keep it intact as well!!!)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://openid.aol.com/lbto813 Lbto813

    i can see why Villinova would make "some" sense in terms of less politics, but it is a horrible idea for a conference already struggling to keep it's AQ integrity intact.

    The best idea in my opinion, is a proactive approach that would be a major overhaul consisting of a C-USA/ BigEast/ WAC/ MWAC conglomerate of joining forces to push for some major restructing.

    The Top "Western" schools in terms of Football program success, and marketability/media coverage areas to band together and form a new conference altogether for AQ status… call it; the "BigWest";
    Boise St./ TCU/ Fresno St./ Nevada/ Houston/ BYU/ Hawai'i/ SDSU/ UTEP/ Tulsa/ SMU/ AF or Wyo
    -that would not only pit the best remaining non-AQ schools all together to face each other in conference play, cutting out the complete cupcake schedule, giving them a legitimate new AQ western conference to compliment the Pac-10, but also covers a nice large media area that includes so-cal, no-cal, texas, and from idaho to utah.

    the "Big East" then could absorb 4 of the top remaining eastcoast FBS-non-AQ football schools; either dropping basketball schools like depaul, providence, seton hall, and notre dame (since they don't play football for us), or if even just for football season, just to expand their own media area and conference schedule;
    WVU/ Cincy/ Syr/ Uconn/ Rutgers/ Pitt/ L'ville/ USF + ECU/ UCF/ So. Miss/ and then either Memphis (hopefully for basketball as well) or Marshall (for more frequent "coal-bowl's")…
    -Big East would then retain their stronghold on the NY media market (w/o losing rutgers or 'quse to the big10) which keeps them legitimate in terms of MEGA-media-contracts. they keep legitimate FBS programs around to face, with large markets and fan bases. they further their own reach into the south for marketing/exposure/ and recruiting, (and have a legitimate "south division" if they would choose to go the route of a 2 division split, and then if both would establish their own media networks, they could work together to share time slots, Big East games could appear on bigwest network as live early games, and big west games could appear on the big east network as live late games. keep live games on as much as possible on both networks;
    -a new bowl game could be established between the top non-BCS qualifying team from each to face off against each other in a "Big Coastal Bowl". any one of those matchups against their said counterpart would most likely prove to be a great game; and also as an annual thing would prove to make for great future rivalries.

    the remaining teams then, from the WAC, MWC, C-USA, could then take a few different roads; they could restructure themselves with the sunbelt & MAC, they could be absorbed elsewhere, combine amongst eachother, or they can then themselves open up the slots for new FCS schools to move up within their conferences.

    this not only ENDS the controversy of the top non-AQ schools crying for more respect, as they all now have a legitimate conference schedule to prove themselves with, all against eachother, only one can come out on top. because the best team there, with a solid OOC win or 2, now undoubtedly deserves the respect of a BCS bowl, right?

    it also allows those lesser non-AQ schools a better chance to win, as the big powerhouse bullies in their conferences are now out, so they could be more competitive amongst eachother, no matter which direction they would choose to go. (and if they take on FCS schools, it would afford those schools a better chance of some immediate success against lesser opponents, rather then stepping into a AQ conference and getting embarrassed for a decade)

    let the big ten take on temple if they want to to make 12, but the idea of a "super conference" is not the best way to go for college football IMO. it hurts the integrity of all the conferences, as well as the chances of success for all the schools within the said super conference.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/13611145289683288344 michael

    Nathan,

    All seven of the Northeast & Ohio Valley-based football schools fly to Florida to play USF in sports. The flight times & costs for those schools would be almost identical to flight prices/times to DFW. I just don't understand why eastern Texas schools would be too far but USF or UCF isn't.

    Distance to Texas ought to be a non-factor, anyway. Even though TCU doesn't exactly captivate the DFW market, it's still in a market far, far larger than UCF's, ECU's, Memphis's, or even Temple's/Villanova's. In other words, there are more potential new viewers of Big East football in the football-crazed, highly-populated, insanely-fast-growing state of Texas than anywhere else.

    UCF may have a new stadium and a decided edge in terms of future alumni base & current student population, but TCU overcomes that edge because its athletic revenue is still higher. It's also renovating its stadium, and has Jerry's World down the road available for marquee matchups.

    The most important factor in expansion, at this level, is television revenue, which comes not simply from local viewership but from overall, national viewership. So which matchup is going to draw more viewers across the country: TCU vs. Cincinnati, or ECU vs. West Virginia? TCU vs. Pittsburgh, or UCF vs. UConn? Memphis vs… nevermind, ESPN wouldn't even pick that game up unless it was on Tuesday night garbage time.

    Concerns about TCU football attendance? Well, other than home games against BYU & Utah, their schedule hasn't offered much interesting to casual fans. That would change with Big East membership. But, again, attendance at the games pales in comparison to whether a team can drive TV revenue.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/08141427447547237948 Michael

    If the Big East takes Temple, then they are admitting it was mistake to let them go in the first place. Further, Temple never entered the discussion when the league raided CUSA.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/07829911459870773896 Nathan Brice

    I would say that Temple is a better choice because they could become a full member earlier than Villanova. TCU and Houston are too far away to join the Big East. Central Florida, Memphis, and East Carolina may seem like logical choices, but they probably would not do as well in a BCS conference. Sure they would love to force Notre Dame's hand, but I am not sure that any of these moves would do it.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/08141427447547237948 Michael

    Villanova does not have the endowment or the booster bucks to fund a Division 1-A program. At best, in 30 years, they could be Northwestern. The 'Nova idea is being fronted because it provides the path of least resistance.

    Temple, Memphis and Houston do not give access to anything. Didn't the last round of conference shakeup put this myth to rest?

    I would be surprised if USF allows UCF into the Big East party but would not have much a choice.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Advertise:


We have multiple spaces on this site available for advertising. Contact us to have your company exposed to our large audience.


About Me:


Matt Peloquin
matt@collegesportsinfo.com
IM: Skype Me™! collegesportsinfo collegesportsinf collegesportsinfo collegesportsinfo@hotmail
Follow this site on
Twitter

Reach me on:

Check out on my other professional site, ClearStage.com . You can also reach Matt Peloquin via his other sites: Matt Peloquin Blog, as well as Matt Peloquin.com

Or reach me on these other services:
Blogger

© CollegeSportsInfo.com. site designed by Matt Peloquin & Clear Stage