NCAA Conference Realignment & Expansion Message Boards
NCAA Map

Discussions by Conference:
  It is currently Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:28 pm

Help support CollegeSportsInfo.com by shopping

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:13 pm 
Offline
Sophomore
Sophomore

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 9:44 pm
Posts: 56

Quote:

I think every conference to a certain degree wants to affiliate with like institutions. But the Intermountain West is a different region for college conference alignment. It lacks population like all the other conferences do, however its a premeir conference for a handful of states in which their 9 institutions are located in. Particularly Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming and in Colorado too, sharing with the Big 12 that state.)


Not only does the BCS look if you carry the state athletically, but it also looks at if your schools schools carry metro markets.

San Diego St is the only 1-A school in the San Diego market. USC and UCLA carry L.A., while Cal and Stanford carry the Bay area. When they aren't winning, the PAC-10 Californian schools draw in the 40-50k range much like Pitt or Syracuse. An argument for SDSU being first tier is very plausible.

The case for TCU as a first tier market carrier is more questionable, but it does have merit. TCU is the highest profile athletic conference located in the Dallas-FtWorth metroplex. The next nearest BCS school is I believe Oklahoma 3-4 hours away. If Texas was in the greater Dallas-Ft Worth metropolitan area then TC as a first tier would be a much tougher argument to sell.

As to what the next expansion move would be by the MWC, the focus is going to be on obtaining BCS membership. I would have to say Boise St has the best argument for the 10th position in the MWC because of play on the field, and they are the closest resemblance of a major program in a growing state of 1.5 million people. Fresno and UTEP are also candidates with their major support numbers in both football and basketball, but marketwise they can't lay claim to anything more than their metro areas.

Montana isn't far enough along in football yet to be a serious candidate for the MWC. The WAC isn't a very good league to join right now with the instability and travel costs for Montana but they've got to make the investment in 1-A if they want that coveted MWC bid.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 5:37 pm 
Offline
Freshman
Freshman

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 15
The WAC will take Montana when the MWC takes a 2 or 3 off the top like Nevada, Fresno, Boise, or Hawaii. The WAC will be Sun-Belt-esque and probably get all the bigger Big Sky schools to move up to I-A and merge with them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:57 am 
Offline
Junior
Junior

Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:29 am
Posts: 93
I dont think montana necissarilly wants to move up to 1-a, defenitely not without montana state. also a lot of their success comes from i-a transfers which they wouldnt get in the wac or mwc. yes the wac will end up taking big sky schools after being raided by the mwc. sac state, portland state, and uc davis are probably the candidates.


Last edited by bigd on Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
 

 

cron




Looking for College Sports apparel? Support our partner:








Support Our Partners: Search Engine Marketing - Search Engine Optimization - Search Engine Training - Online Marketing for Restuarants

Subway Map Shirts - Food and Travel

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group