NCAA Conference Realignment & Expansion Message Boards
 
 

 

 
Discussions by Conference:
It is currently Mon May 20, 2013 11:26 pm
Help support CollegeSportsInfo.com by shopping on Amazon

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 736 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 50  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:08 am 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Posts: 7048
C-USA MB thread discussing BYU situation and possible future impact on C-USA at http://ncaabbs.com/showthread.php?tid=447626


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:36 am 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Posts: 7048
Article out of West Virginia with "speculation" regarding SOME TYPE of possible C-USA/MWC partnership.Link at http://www.herald-dispatch.com/sports/x ... gotiations


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 1:50 pm 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Posts: 7048
Official C-USA release regarding yesterday's C-USA/MWC meeting at http://conferenceusa.cstv.com/genrel/082010aab.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:52 pm 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Posts: 7048
C-USA MB thread discussing yesterday's C-USA/MWC meeting at http://ncaabbs.com/showthread.php?tid=448149


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 12:03 am 
Offline
All-Conference
All-Conference

Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 851
I can't see the NCAA approving a C-USA/MWC play-in to the BCS unless C-USA was to forgo it's championship game (which makes all kinds of problems)

_________________
1897-1898 | 1900-06 | 1926-27 | 1929-30 | 1939 | 1942


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:55 am 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:25 pm
Posts: 1490
Exactly -

This MWC / CUSA deal sort of only makes sense if the MWC and CUSA were round-robin conferences, and neither group has to endure a conf. championship game, then a MWC-CUSA playoff, then a BCS bowl.

We keep hearing about "20" teams. Well, right now there aer 23 (11 + 12), where the MWC 11 includes BYU. How do you get to 20 ? Lose 3 teams. How do you lose 3 teams without lawsuits galore ???

Hmmm. The one guy quoted (was it the New Mexico College President) inferred that somehing we don't know about may happen in the next 2 weeks. I have NO informatioin on this, but just suppose for a minute the BE were to expand with Temple, and 3 CUSA teams (UCF, Memphis, and ??? ECU, maybe, Houston, maybe ?)

Suddenly CUSA is at 9, MWC is at 11. Move TCU back to the CUSA grouping and you have 10 and 10.
Each grouping plays a 9-game round-robin, and then the champs of each meet in this BCS Play-in game.

Basically you have the MWC in the West, CUSA in the East. The Jerry Jones dome is fairly central, although it'd almost be a home game for Fort Worth-based TCU....

The Big XII (X, actually) has based their new format on a round-robin. I think UT vs. A&M is typically Thanksgiving weekend. There was some talk of moving the UT vs. OU ("Red River Shoot-out") to the last weekend of conference play, and again you could stuff 100,000 + into the Cowboy's Stadium (although I thought I read that the old Cotton Bowl is undergoing renovations.... Do they still have a contract to host that game ?

The Cotton Bowl game itself is moving to Cowboys' stadium and the renovated Cotton Bowl stadium will host the new Dallas Football Classic bowl game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:55 am 
Online
CollegeSportsInfo Admin
CollegeSportsInfo Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:05 am
Posts: 3753
Temple to CUSA rumors today...

http://news.collegesportsinfo.com/2010/ ... e-usa.html

_________________
Image

Image@ncaasports Image csi.com/facebook

Image
Like the new CSI Userbar? Feel free to use it here and any other forums.
You can save and host it yourself or link from here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:09 am 
Offline
Senior
Senior

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:53 pm
Posts: 282
If CUSA and MWC move to have a BCS Championship play in game, then it makes sense for TCU to join CUSA. TCU would dominate CUSA for years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:58 am 
Online
CollegeSportsInfo Admin
CollegeSportsInfo Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:05 am
Posts: 3753
Thanks actually a great point. Travel costs would be less. But the move only makes sense if the championship game always exists. TCU in the MWC does keep the MWC closer to getting an autobid. Who knows, maybe in 3 years, you'll have BSU, TCU and a 3rd school in the MWC sitting in the top 15 each year and making the MWC worthy of an autobid. But with TCU gone, that would never happen.

_________________
Image

Image@ncaasports Image csi.com/facebook

Image
Like the new CSI Userbar? Feel free to use it here and any other forums.
You can save and host it yourself or link from here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:17 pm 
Offline
Senior
Senior
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:47 pm
Posts: 218
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Quinn wrote:


Perhaps C-USA is preparing for some schools to leave in the near future, or even their own split a little further down the line. We've already heard rumors of Memphis and UCF to the Big East... Maybe they are trying to organize a group of Mid-Atlantic/Eastern schools with a core of Marshall, Temple, and ECU. I'm less likely to believe that TCU is going to C-USA though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:32 pm 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 2:09 pm
Posts: 1231
Temple has been in the BE & MAC for fb only. If they go to C-USA, I assume it will be for "all sports". While their A10 association has been long-term, they need the advantages of an all-sports affiiation for stability and cultivating rivalries across sports. C-USA would provide Temple competition at a level consistent with it's general profile. I believe it would be a smart move for Temple. Getting back into the BE, particularly for an "all-sports" capacity does not appear on the horizon. There's probably lingering bitterness from the fb booting; and pettiness from one or two BE bb schools anyway. Considering all, C-USA may be the best fit for Temple.

As a poster indicated above, C-USA may lose some, add some. The focus may be with MWC and/or WAC types. I am not convinced Memphis and UCF are leaving for the BE anytime soon, if ever. The BE will just sit in stalemate, and after others are done, declare once again, "there is just not anyone of value to add". What the BE is doing by their posture, is giving proactive conferences such as the MWC and C-USA, stronger cases for improved BCS access.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:02 am 
Offline
All-Conference
All-Conference

Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 851
sec03 wrote:
Temple has been in the BE & MAC for fb only. If they go to C-USA, I assume it will be for "all sports". While their A10 association has been long-term, they need the advantages of an all-sports affiiation for stability and cultivating rivalries across sports. C-USA would provide Temple competition at a level consistent with it's general profile. I believe it would be a smart move for Temple. Getting back into the BE, particularly for an "all-sports" capacity does not appear on the horizon. There's probably lingering bitterness from the fb booting; and pettiness from one or two BE bb schools anyway. Considering all, C-USA may be the best fit for Temple.


Well, I think it's a great move for Temple long term, I'd disagree with the "general profile" idea. Temple only competes in the A-10 aside in hoops and volleyball. The rest they merely participate in.

It's a great move because it gives them a better chance to show the BCS conferences "Hey, we bring something to the table" than if they are in the MAC.

_________________
1897-1898 | 1900-06 | 1926-27 | 1929-30 | 1939 | 1942


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:59 pm 
Offline
Senior
Senior

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 9:04 pm
Posts: 327
C-USA has some consistent, decent bb programs, i. e. Memphis and UAB. Temple would not have as much regional bb for conference play, but that could emerge as C-USA may re-shape. As to fb, Temple is not yet on par, consistently, with USM, Houston, ECU, and UCF; but the potential is there. Looking at not being accepted to the BE and the MAC is temporary comfort zone for rebuilding, C-USA appears the best option. As to profile, a cut below BCS conference status is apparent, and C-USA provides a superior conference image to the MAC and Sunbelt. While Temple can be unpredictable and too much on the negative side, it may just fit in C-USA beyond basic expectations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:53 am 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Posts: 7048
C-USA MB thread discussing comments from ECU Chancellor regarding some type of future C-USA/MWC partnership at http://ncaabbs.com/showthread.php?tid=448847


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:39 am 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:37 pm
Posts: 7048
Article out of Houston with comments from C-USA Commish and UH AD regarding conference realignment at http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/spo ... 75396.html


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 736 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 50  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Looking for College Sports apparel? Support our partner:







Support Our Partners: Search Engine Marketing - Search Engine Optimization - Search Engine Training - Online Marketing for Restuarants

Subway Map Shirts - Food and Travel

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group