Fresno St. Alum wrote:
If they do move, I can't figure why 10/14 or why we don't hear the reasoning for 10/14 if a merger. Could it be that the MWC is merging into CUSA so that's why these are all CUSA adds? MWC added SJSU and USU, w/ the thinking just in case it doesn't pan out as a merger they have 10.
It would make sense for C-USA to protect their future interests if the MWC thing doesn't pan out.
Like I said earlier, if Charlotte is going to eventually be a better candidate than a current Sun Belt school, screw the Sun Belt school and take Charlotte NOW before they rise up to the Big East's wish list.
Fresno St. Alum wrote:
I don't know what to think. I was just sold on us staying separate until that article. It could be the writer doesn't know sh*t, they did leave out La Tech.
Or the writer knows more than everyone else, since La Tech is still a bad play.
I think this gives C-USA options.
No merger, like we said above (although, I'd take FAU over La Tech 100 times out of 100)
In a "Football Confederation" with seperate conferences, UTEP joins to MWC; One of Tulsa, North Texas or UTSA plays in the MWC as a member of C-USA, and Hawaii is football only in the MWC.
Full Merger, doesn't matter which conference brings 14 and which brings 10.
MTSU gets you in nashville and they are better than FAU. I'd take either over tech.
Full merger 12/12 makes the most sense. why have f'd up schedules where 1 side would have a conf title(semi-final) while the other wouldn't and would play round robin.