|
|
|
| | Link to Post - Back to Top IP: 66.158.196.29 |
RumorFromCO | | | Re: Big 12 realignment
« Reply #66 on 5/2/2005 at 6:37pm » | [Quote] [Modify] [Delete] |
From an article in the Boulder Daily Camera:
http://www.dailycamera.com/bdc/sports_columnists/article/0,1713,BDC_2417_3745086,00.html
"But sources around the conference have recently hinted that chatter in conference backrooms suggests the football proposal might simply be laying the groundwork for something bigger.
There are rumors that the schools in the Big 12 South are quietly considering "seceding" from the conference. The theory is that the six schools from the South would invite Arkansas back to the fold, then invite someone such as TCU or SMU to help form a reborn, eight-team SWC.
That would obviously send North schools scrambling. Colorado, once a target of the Pac-10, would no doubt see if there's still any interest from those quarters. Missouri would turn an eye toward the Big Ten.
That would leave four other schools looking for a home.
Kansas State and Iowa State, two schools with no nationwide appeal and no television market, would be out in the cold.
Kansas, with its basketball tradition, would be appealing to someone, but probably not a conference with the current punch of the Big 12.
As for Nebraska, word is no conference is anxious to invite NU because of the Huskers' penchant for lax academic standards.
Far-fetched? Of course — but it's also worth remembering that the current Big 12 television contracts are up in 2007.
After that, negotiations are open, and anything's possible.
Stay tuned."
Last edited by RumorFrom on Wed May 04, 2005 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RumorFrom
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 8:42 pm |
|
|
|
|
| | Link to Post - Back to Top IP: 66.158.196.29 |
RumorFromCO | | | Re: Big 12 realignment
« Reply #68 on 5/2/2005 at 6:54pm » | [Quote] [Modify] [Delete] |
Sorry...slipped.
Anyways, some background to this:
- The "football proposal" is in reference to the recent request by the Oklahoma and Texas AD's to remove the divisions and hold a championship games for simply the top 2 teams of the 12. In addition, a suggestion was to remove the neutral site for the championship game and give home field advantage to the best overall team in the regular season.
- The North would clearly be against this, as it would prevent many of the teams from ever seeing the championship game....Iowa St, for example.
- In addition, there would need to be an appeal to the NCAA to allow a championship game for 12 teams with no divisions.
- The author admits this is certainly a stretch...but wow...that would be stunning if that happened. I think if the B12 South could get Arkansas-LSU or even Arizona-Arizona St......they would do it. But can they get those teams? And is this just a threat? Hard to say...but it is clear the Big 12 is somewhat unstable at this point.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Mr Ouija
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 9:30 am |
|
|
|
|
I think that the reborn Southwest Conference should invite Phillips and Southwestern...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Mr Ouija
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 9:33 am |
|
|
|
|
Apparently L(ouisiana) S(tate) U(niversity) and Ole Miss(issippi) were extended offers at the formation of the old Southwest(ern) Conference but declined...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
WildcatFan
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 9:41 am |
|
|
|
Quote:
TX and A&M garner more academic respect nationally that all the SEC schools except Vandy.
Unless you mean they are at a disadvantage in recruiting vs. SEC schools due to that fact...
This is fundamentally not true. Florida is an AAU school, for example, and Georgia has delivered some impressive reseach, including Teacher Education. The International Business program at the University of South Carolina is among the nation's best. Mississippi State is well distinguished in agriculture and forestry. Ole Miss is well know in English Literature and some of the other fine arts.
Auburn, LSU, and other SEC schools are on the rise academically.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
bullet
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:50 pm |
|
 |
| All-Conference |
 |
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 8:08 pm Posts: 979
|
|
Sorry Wildcat fan, you are a little SECentric. The Big 12 has 7 AAU schools. The SEC 2. Certainly almost all the I-A schools have areas where they are very good and perhaps even the best in the nation (and many I-AA, Div. II and Div. III schools as well), but overall only Florida among the SEC publics are mentioned in the same breath as A&M, let alone Texas. His facts are quite correct.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Mr Ouija
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 9:08 pm |
|
|
|
|
Why does the notion of "Teacher Education" at UGA immediately conjure up images of Jim Harrick Jr. and Jan Kemp?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
GunnerFanOffline
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 11:59 am |
|
|
|
Quote: Why does the notion of "Teacher Education" at UGA immediately conjure up images of Jim Harrick Jr. and Jan Kemp?
Now that's funny!
Even moreso when you consider the state of Georgia's secondary education system. "We're #49! We're #49!" Thank heaven for all these out-of-staters, otherwise the state would look awful in statistics concerning adult education levels.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
UGAaCutabove
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 12:29 pm |
|
|
|
|
Wonderful to see Mr. Gunnerfan, Mr. Ouija, and Bullet are such experts in assessing higher education in America. Which on of you is going to be the next Sec'y of Education? The University of Georgia will survive just fine, and will have no need to incorporate your knee-jerk, amateurish assessments into its future. And which one(s) amongst you are from the north, got your higher education in Georgia, and didn't leave? Enough said!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
| | | |