DawgNDuckfan, the BCS would have been history if the Big 10 and Pac 10 would have failed to join the BCS. At the very least the BCS would have been a regional bowl alignment without a national championship game.
The BCS is not going to dictate to any conference the number of teams required expecially the Pac 10 and Big 10.
ya never know Lash. ya never know. :o
If you follow the Pac 10, you would surely be aware of the Pac 10 meetings this past summer. The Pac 10 clearly stated and was published in all major western papers there will be not expansion.
I follow Oregon football, not the Pac 10 as a league. Therefore, these meetings come as news to me.
Unlike some of the southern based conferences, the Pac 10 has integrity. Maybe integrity is a regional thing?
I wouldn't be too sure about that Lash. My own team had some shady dealings I wasn't too pleased with. Basically what U of O said was, "Play for the Ducks football team, and you get to have your own personal stripper." ::) Wow, that move has a lot of integrity in it, now doesn't it? ::) For some oddball reason, it isn't a violation of NCAA rules, although it should be, IMO. Those girls ought to be ashamed of themselves for being used as prostitutes for the football teams recruits!!! >:( I won't even mention Arizona's State's NCAA violation in track & field, of all sports. ::) Oops, I just mentioned it. ;D And the less said about Neweasel's Huskies, the better. >:( And this is not even taking Mike Price's past actions at WSU into account. :o Don't even get me started on Michigan, OSU, or UCLA.