That's hilarious! Just so everyone else knows, the Pac 10 clearly has too many bowls. One source predicts they will not have enought eligible teams to fill THREE of their bowls!
In fairness, if either Cal or USC don't go BCS, the Pac 10 will "only" be overextended by two bowls.
Fossil, I think I know what EarthX is saying, he just kind of wrote it in shorthand.
The Pac-10 definitely has numbers. The issue is quality.
#1 - BCS
#2 - Holiday v Big 12 #3
#3 - Sun v Big 10 #5
#4 - Insight v Big East #3 or #4
#5 - Las Vegas v Mountain West #2
#6 - Emerald v Mountain West #3
#7 - Silicon Valley v Fresno errrrrr a selected WAC team
For national perception, the Pac-10 could use the Gator. In all likelihood, however, the Gator probably doesn't want to sell tickets all the way across the country. Such is the Pac's lot.
Oh, if I dare further the tangent... look at that list again. The WAC would kill for a better Pac-10 bowl slot, but that's all they rate. Will someone tell me again why the Mountain West even needs to worry about expanding with schools from the WAC when the WAC already has multiple weapons pointed at it?