NCAA Conference Realignment & Expansion Message Boards
 
 

 

 
Discussions by Conference:
It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 5:44 am
Help support CollegeSportsInfo.com by shopping on Amazon

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 376 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:14 am 
Offline
Senior
Senior

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:53 pm
Posts: 282
The options for the 3 or 4 are limited today. But when splits and realignments start happening, maybe things will
open up. One option worth mentioning is the Southland moving back up to FBS. In it's glory years the SLC did
play I-A football. The Louisiana schools would be the big question mark considering the state budget cutting.

Another option, get UCA and SFA to move up too. That makes the 6/5 rule.

We talk about the CUSA split, but what about a Sunbelt split. Sunbelt east teams could join upgrading teams in that region
like Georgia st. Sunbelt west teams could join SLC 3 or 4. If Sunbelt west joins UTSA, Texas st, Lamar, and SHSU and La tech joins,
you will have the mighty 1970's/1980's Southland conference again. Talk about coming full circle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 7:48 pm 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:56 pm
Posts: 2514
Location: Reedley, CA
SBC(10)

FAU
FIU
WKU
Troy
USA
MTSU
Charlotte*
Georgia St.*
Jacksonville St.*
Georgia So.*

SWC(10)

N.Texas
Arkansas St.
ULM
ULL
UTSA*
Texas St.*
Lamar*
SHSU*
UALR
UNO

This is a great idea and fills the 6/5 on both ends. You just need to get SBC commish Waters on board with it.

I left out La.Tech because they won't go to a weaker version of the SBC let alone the SBC. The SLC can stay as a FCS without trying to drag in schools not ready for the FBS. C.Oklahoma and Tarleton St. would move from D-II to fill the hole putting them at 10 members.

Denver to the Summit or WCC

_________________
Image
WRANGLERS 153-55-1 CVFL CHAMPS '04 '05 '09 '12
Image
NFL CHAMPS '29 '30 '31 '36 '39 '44 '61 '62 '65 '66 '67 '96 '10
Image
BW/WAC/MWC CHAMPS '77 '82 '85 '88 '89 '91 '92 '93 '99 '12
'08 NCAA BASEBALL CHAMPS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:07 am 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star

Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:25 pm
Posts: 1510
Something like this could eventually happen. It lays out pretty well.

If it did, I would expect Centenary , UTPA, and Houston Baptist to get a look from the Southland.

The schools I question would be UNCC (Charlotte) and UNO.
Both fit as shown, however, UNO has it's financial situation to deal with, and I wonder if Charlotte is more focused on getting into an eastern (I'm thinking the BE), rather than a southeastern conference once they add football.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:24 am 
Offline
Senior
Senior

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:53 pm
Posts: 282
SWC(10)

N.Texas
Arkansas St.
ULM
ULL
UTSA*
Texas St.*
Lamar*
SHSU*
UALR
UNO

I put "?" next to UNO and ULM.
We all know UNO situation.
ULM is the smallest school in the group with an enrollment of 7,000 in a small market within 30 miles of La Tech and
also near Grambling.
La Tech is also 12,000. small market and within 30 miles of Grambling and ULM.
ULL enrollment is 18,000...nice mid-size market
How will budget cuts hurt the La schools?


UALR is second smallest 12,000. no football.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
Freshman
Freshman

Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:07 pm
Posts: 38
UTSA and Texas State definitely want to be part of some FBS conference, but UTSA won't be eligible to transition to FBS until the 2013 season. Lamar is starting football a year ahead of UTSA so they should be ready to go FBS when UTSA does. Texas State has already started on facility upgrades so in a few years they can go FBS.

Central Arkansas will finish their transition from DII to DI in 2010 so they can probably start their FBS transition in 2011 if they wanted to, but they need a lot of facility upgrades. I'm not sold on SHSU's ability to go FBS yet, especially with their distance from the Houston metro, so they stay in the SLC.

UTSA, Texas State, Central Arkansas are located in big metro areas (UCA is only 30 miles from Little Rock), while Lamar is in a decent size metro area. Add UTA in the DFW metro and TAMU-CC in the Corpus Christi metro and that's a pretty good core of a conference.

I like the idea of adding Oral Roberts. It's a good basketball and baseball school in Tulsa. I would try to get Missouri State to upgrade to FBS and join the conference. It's over 20K in students in a good metro area that's growing, plus Mo State is good at basketball and baseball.

Next I'd go after Wichita State. They could keep their rivalry with Mo State, they are also a good basketball and baseball school, plus they might bring back football in the future.

At this point we have 5 football schools and 9 total schools. Now it gets even trickier because this conference needs some established FBS schools because there's not any more FCS schools in the region that can move up.

I'd try to get La Tech from the WAC. They do get good TV money from the WAC now, but that could always change and travel costs would be a lot smaller in this new conference. They do feel superior to everyone so this might be a hard sell.

And finally from the SBC I'd try to get Arkansas State and UL-Lafayette. This would renew old rivalries and since the SBC isn't a cash cow now, they could be sold on the idea that this new conference will surpass the SBC quickly, not mention less travel costs. The Sunbelt could easily add Georgia State and another eastern team and still be as strong as it is now.

Now you have 8 football schools:
UTSA
Texas State
Lamar
Central Arkansas
La Tech
Missouri State
Arkansas State
UL-Lafayette

Plus 4 basketball schools:
UTA
TAMU-CC
Oral Roberts
Wichita State

Out of the gate this should make for a strong basketball and baseball conference. The footprint would cover Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Kansas (similar to the Big 12 footprint), and in enough large markets that they could get a TV contract in place fairly quickly, and could get multiple basketball bids yearly.

I think the only way this coalition of schools would come together to form a new conference if they were optimistic that they could attract attention and money right away.

UNT could be tempted to join up, although I don't want to see too may Texas schools. SHSU could take the place of TAMU-CC or UTA, which would be ok since they are also good at basketball and baseball. Maybe New Mexico State would join, although they would really add travel miles to the other schools.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:59 pm 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:56 pm
Posts: 2514
Location: Reedley, CA
I know UNO is tricky but I had to put them in there so the 6/5 would work. If they dropped to D-II then the SWC would have to keep Denver around 5 more years.

The reason I don't think the SWC would want 4 bball only schools is that I see how FBS conference want to rid themselves of non-fb members BE is an exception for now. C-USA had SLU and UNCC leave. SBC had WKU(from FCS), USA(start up) play fb in the conference. It could also hurt the confernce if one of the fb schools joins another conference. If they have 10 they could always go to 12 with 1 or 2 more fb schools if any move up. It not so bad going from 10 to 9 or 9 to 8. 8 to 7 is bad and could be a while for a move up.

SLC will need to add 2 football schools to get back to 8 FB and if they want back at 12 then yes UTPA and HBU would be options. They could even look to add 3 FB for an even 4/4 schedule (Arkansas Tech) D-II always has rumors about them wanting to be on par with UCA.

So we all think this is logical and it works so the SBC will never let it happen. Wake up SBC we at CSI can save your conf schools lots of money listen to us.

_________________
Image
WRANGLERS 153-55-1 CVFL CHAMPS '04 '05 '09 '12
Image
NFL CHAMPS '29 '30 '31 '36 '39 '44 '61 '62 '65 '66 '67 '96 '10
Image
BW/WAC/MWC CHAMPS '77 '82 '85 '88 '89 '91 '92 '93 '99 '12
'08 NCAA BASEBALL CHAMPS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:07 pm 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:56 pm
Posts: 2514
Location: Reedley, CA
Who would let Charlotte in? BE isn't going to 17. C-USA to 13 or 14? SBC could be a good home until something opens up.

_________________
Image
WRANGLERS 153-55-1 CVFL CHAMPS '04 '05 '09 '12
Image
NFL CHAMPS '29 '30 '31 '36 '39 '44 '61 '62 '65 '66 '67 '96 '10
Image
BW/WAC/MWC CHAMPS '77 '82 '85 '88 '89 '91 '92 '93 '99 '12
'08 NCAA BASEBALL CHAMPS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:08 pm 
Online
CollegeSportsInfo Admin
CollegeSportsInfo Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:05 am
Posts: 3764
Fresno St. Alum wrote:
Who would let Charlotte in? BE isn't going to 17. C-USA to 13 or 14? SBC could be a good home until something opens up.


I think the hopes for Charlotte are that they build a program that grows to IA status and eventually get's a Big East invite should a split occur and Memphis joins (bringing back together with Memphis, Louisville and Cincy)

_________________
Image

Image@ncaasports Image csi.com/facebook

Image
Like the new CSI Userbar? Feel free to use it here and any other forums.
You can save and host it yourself or link from here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:05 pm 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:56 pm
Posts: 2514
Location: Reedley, CA
But like you said Quinn the Big East won't split unless they feel there is a need to, and there isn't right now. How long is Charlotte willing to sit around as an FBS Indy and wait for a call to the BE which they might not get.

Something tells me the Big East will be split by the time Charlotte is FBS AND strong enough a program to warrant an invite. The Big East could have taken ECU which has has success, is in the ACC market, and averaged 42,000 per game last year. Charlotte existing won't be enough. They will need to prove they belong.

_________________
Image
WRANGLERS 153-55-1 CVFL CHAMPS '04 '05 '09 '12
Image
NFL CHAMPS '29 '30 '31 '36 '39 '44 '61 '62 '65 '66 '67 '96 '10
Image
BW/WAC/MWC CHAMPS '77 '82 '85 '88 '89 '91 '92 '93 '99 '12
'08 NCAA BASEBALL CHAMPS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:47 pm 
Offline
All-Conference
All-Conference

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:05 am
Posts: 556
Location: Dallas
accseahawk wrote:
does the wac once again try to venture east and pick up all three of these teams.

wac east
la tech
texas st
utsa
lamar
new mexico st
utah st

wac west
nevada
boise st
idaho
san jose st
fresno st
hawaii

that would help stabilize things in the wac in case boise state and other defect to mwc.



I agree that it is a decent idea, but I am tired to waiting for the WAC to be aggressive in assuring it's future. I think these schools and their management are narrowminded, self-centered, and short-sighted.

This would work out pretty well for most WAC West schools in terms of travel, but the schools are too dispersed to really allow them to take advantage of their markets. The WAC has a small TV pie. Their shares would shrink dramatically by going along with this.

Football only, it could be a decent move, but even then, how would you like to be Utah State? I suspect they would raise hell over this.

I am becoming quite myopic with my view that the WAC's ideal solution is adding Sac State.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:08 pm 
Offline
All-Conference
All-Conference

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:05 am
Posts: 556
Location: Dallas
playa4life wrote:
The options for the 3 or 4 are limited today. But when splits and realignments start happening, maybe things will
open up. One option worth mentioning is the Southland moving back up to FBS. In it's glory years the SLC did
play I-A football. The Louisiana schools would be the big question mark considering the state budget cutting.


Since they didn't want to move up before the recession, I can't image they would now.

playa4life wrote:
Another option, get UCA and SFA to move up too. That makes the 6/5 rule.


I think UCA is a real darkhorse. I don't think they expected to be as competiive as they have been. SFA, IMO, will rue the day they passed on upgrading.

playa4life wrote:
We talk about the CUSA split, but what about a Sunbelt split. Sunbelt east teams could join upgrading teams in that region
like Georgia st. Sunbelt west teams could join SLC 3 or 4. If Sunbelt west joins UTSA, Texas st, Lamar, and SHSU and La tech joins,
you will have the mighty 1970's/1980's Southland conference again. Talk about coming full circle.



This is a great point. I have thought the the unspoken advantage that might help the breakaway schools pry away members is past affiliations. Arkansas State, Louisiana Tech, ULL, UTPA, NO, Lamar, and outlier UCF comprised the American South Conference. Ark State, ULM, and La Tech were former southland members. I thought this would help them pry members away, but it could also help them in if the number of members in the conference that are opposed drop off either through defection or a split. What if the Sunbelt creates the additional NCAA berth?

Lets start with defections. If CUSA split, what conference would Memphis go with? The western schools have the high endowment, big academic stature that the BCS schools like. Football-wise the east may be marginally better, but the west is more likely to get BCS status. Additionally the west has Tulsa BB, the east BB is not very good. The west is closer and has the Houston and DFW BB hotbeds for recruiting.

There is a pretty reasonable possibility you might see a 7/5 split (Memphis going with the west) with the west schools doing the east schools a solid and have a school like Tulane playing basketball only in the CUSA East to allow the east to keep their auto bid, allowing them to reload the conference. (In that scenario you might see the SWC -CUSA West- go after a school like St. Louis as their lone non-football member.)

The 5 team CUSA East could land Charlotte for at least all sports besides BB, giving the CUSA East 6 teams in all sports. In that scenario, I could see CUSA East raiding the Sunbelt east pretty hard. At that point, their league would be small and precieved as pretty marginal. IMO they would probably not be strong enough to get teams above the sunbelt level on their terms.

Killing the part of the sunbelt in their footprint might would make the resulting conference less lost in the conference clutter and would give them quantity, if a modest bump in quality. Temple could (possibly would) join for football if offered and considering the proximity to ECU and Marshall, that could happen. FAU may be an emerging non-BCS power. Same for Troy. FIU bears many of the same attribs as UCF. UCF and UAB might push for all of them. MTU and WKY might be get in to help Marshall and allow North/South split scheduling. USA has a nice stadium and is in the footprint. CUSA East would probably follow conference etiquette and not kill the sunbelt by dropping them below 6 --- costing them their autobid. (with Denver they'd be at 6.)

With 6 eastern Sunbelt schools captured, Tulane BB could split for the SWC and the new CUSA East would still satisfy the 5/6/7 rule.

In that scenario, The sunbelt has Denver, Arky St., ULL, ULM, UALR, UNO. 6 schools, 3 all sports, 3 BB, and 2 poor, sparsely populated states and a nice distant market in Denver. At that point the Sunbelt would probably be quite eager to offer slots to nearby Texas Schools UTSA (San Antonio DMA), Texas St (Austin DMA), Lamar (good BB), and SHSU (Houston DMA) --- possibly also to non-football schools UTA (DFW DMA) and ORU (Tulsa DMA) --- to add markets and bridge the conference to much needed Denver. Even at this point they only have 7 for football. (Could you get NMSU to join? Tough sell, IMO. Jacksonville State may be your best option for #8.)

My issue with that is that you are counting on a lot of movement at the top going a certain way --- and that direction might not be likely--- plus SHSU moving up afterall to even get close.

If CUSA splits 6/6 and Charlotte rejoins for all sports (due to Memphis BB and a nice footprint), the east CUSA East really only needs 1 more member to have 8 for football. Would St Louis return as well as a non-football member? Could they pry away Temple for all sports....??? With Temple, St. Louis, and Charlotte, it might be quite possible. My guts tell me they still need more big markets (FAU/FIU?)...but they could be like the WAC ---refusing to lower themslves to admit teams perceived to be lesser class.

If the Sunbelt stays at 11 or 12, there is no slot for all of the southland schools unless the sunbelt splits over travel.

So lets play that scenario out. UNT seems destined to move up. If the BE raids a team, they will likely be CUSA #12. (They almost were team #12 in the CUSA, but their facilities cost them getting in. They have since replaced all of their facilities except their stadium and are scheduled to have a new stadium completed soon to complete the renewal. In addition their athletics budget is going to be upper CUSA to MWC level in 10 years. They are the largest enrollment in the DFW DMA and most of their alumni base is local.) If they go out that would leave an ideal 9 for SBC football and a not so ideal 11 for BB.

Would the commish push to admit more Texas schools? Would they boot both BB schools and add the 3 texas schools? I don't think that is likely as it would kill the 6/6 split as a cost saving fallback position and the 3 schools on their own would not really add a lot of TV pull. Would he add the best basketball school he could land and go 9/12? Possibly. If he adds an eastern school (East Tennessee State?) that could end up being a positive financial move in terms of travel costs.

He could retain Denver for 12 to allow a west/east split, selling the member schools on the idea of creating smaller travel footprints and allowing post-season conference bowls in football and in season tourney's in BB.


New American South
Denver
UNO
ULL
ULM
ARK St.
UALR
+
UTSA
Texas State
Lamar
SHSU
UCA???


new sunbelt
FAU
FIU
USA
WKY
Troy
MTU
+
GA So.
Jacksonville State.
App. State?
JMU?
Citadel?

Maybe he could have USA play in the western conference for football for a few few years. I would not list this as a likely scenario. It is a stretch, but it is probably workable, saves money, and the Sunbelt has worked around issues like this before so I cannot eliminate it.

{edit: the recent loss of Calipari at Memphis might make this kind of thing an even longer shot.}


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:09 pm 
Offline
Senior
Senior

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:53 pm
Posts: 282
wac east
la tech
texas st
utsa
lamar
new mexico st
utah st

wac west
nevada
boise st
idaho
san jose st
fresno st
hawaii
Football only, this could work very well. Full conference, No way. Travel for other sports would be a killer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:45 am 
Offline
All-Conference
All-Conference

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:05 am
Posts: 556
Location: Dallas
Fresno St. Alum wrote:
SBC(10)

FAU
FIU
WKU
Troy
USA
MTSU
Charlotte*
Georgia St.*
Jacksonville St.*
Georgia So.*

SWC(10)

N.Texas
Arkansas St.
ULM
ULL
UTSA*
Texas St.*
Lamar*
SHSU*
UALR
UNO

This is a great idea and fills the 6/5 on both ends. You just need to get SBC commish Waters on board with it.



The problem is UNT. UNT only lost out to UTEP last time because UTEP had better facilities. UNT will have as good or better facilities than most CUSA schools by 2010-2011 and within 10 years will have a larger athletic budget than most CUSA schools. I think it is pretty likely they are in CUSA west, if CUSA splits.

I think if Denver does actually leave, the sunbelt could lose the option of a nice split like this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:12 am 
Offline
All-Conference
All-Conference

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:05 am
Posts: 556
Location: Dallas
centexguy wrote:
... I would try to get Missouri State to upgrade to FBS and join the conference. It's over 20K in students in a good metro area that's growing, plus Mo State is good at basketball and baseball.

Next I'd go after Wichita State. They could keep their rivalry with Mo State, they are also a good basketball and baseball school, plus they might bring back football in the future.

....I'd try to get La Tech from the WAC. They do get good TV money from the WAC now, but that could always change and travel costs would be a lot smaller in this new conference. They do feel superior to everyone so this might be a hard sell.

And finally from the SBC I'd try to get Arkansas State and UL-Lafayette. This would renew old rivalries and since the SBC isn't a cash cow now, they could be sold on the idea that this new conference will surpass the SBC quickly, not mention less travel costs. The Sunbelt could easily add Georgia State and another eastern team and still be as strong as it is now.

Now you have 8 football schools:
UTSA
Texas State
Lamar
Central Arkansas
La Tech
Missouri State
Arkansas State
UL-Lafayette

Plus 4 basketball schools:
UTA
TAMU-CC
Oral Roberts
Wichita State

Out of the gate this should make for a strong basketball and baseball conference. The footprint would cover Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Kansas (similar to the Big 12 footprint), and in enough large markets that they could get a TV contract in place fairly quickly, and could get multiple basketball bids yearly.

I think the only way this coalition of schools would come together to form a new conference if they were optimistic that they could attract attention and money right away.

UNT could be tempted to join up, although I don't want to see too may Texas schools. SHSU could take the place of TAMU-CC or UTA, which would be ok since they are also good at basketball and baseball. Maybe New Mexico State would join, although they would really add travel miles to the other schools.


Hey Centex! Good to see you again! We are of like minds on this with the exception that I would actually want to see some more texas schools in there. I think you haven't got enough to really grab texan's attention. I'd love UNT in, but I think their stadium and the athletic budget increase will have them moving up. I love the idea of the MVC schools---specifically those two, but I wonder if they would want to put it off due to economic slowdown. I agree that at least 2 teams would make the tourney each year out of that lot.

If UNT is gone, I think Arky state might be willing to listen. ULL would probably love to get away from ULM. La Tech would love a financial escape from the WAC that isn't the sunbelt. They were all in the American South Conference together. I would go hard after strong BB school NMSU if I were the commish ---maybe even cutting them in on a little added travel money... and I'd probably beg the bigger schools to let me take former American South member UTPA too to build a distinct following in a region (Latino South Texas) of similar minded TV markets. (Let me know if they want a comissioner, lol!)

football
NMSU
UTSA
Texas State
Lamar
SHSU
La Tech
Arkansas State
UL-Lafayette

Plus 4 basketball schools:
UTPA
UTA
TAMU-CC
Oral Roberts

I might also pull in privates Denver and Houston Baptist. Denver is a nice big under-represented DMA that one school can deliver. HBU because Houston is way oversaturated with football teams. Adding a small BB team in the city but a reasonable distance from the rockets stadium might make a lot of sense. It would help conference wide recruiting by bumping up media coverage a bit in the city. The smaller stadium is actually not a big hinderance in an NBA killzone. Filling a stadium is more important.

I would be strongly pushing UTPA to add football to be the #9 for scheduling. There has been historic legislative support for football, but not administrative support.

Admittedly with only 5 developed BB programs: ORU, NMSU, Arky St., ULL, and Lamar, this would not be nearly as strong for BB as your suggestion, but I think the TV money would be a lot better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Southland Expansion
PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:10 pm 
Offline
Freshman
Freshman

Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:07 pm
Posts: 38
Thanks for the compliment finiteman. I do enjoy the thought you put into your posts. But I think it would be a mistake to have two many Texas teams in one conference because it would probably alienate the schools from other states and it would reinforce the idea of a minor conference. I like have a conference with a similar footprint as the Big 12, and it would contain a lot of medium to large markets which would give it a lot of potential.

Let's look at the latest DMA rankings of the schools in my new conference:

football schools:
UTSA, San Antonio #37
Texas State, Austin #49
Lamar, Beaumont-Port Arthur #141
Central Arkansas, Little Rock #56
La Tech, either Shreveport #84, or Monroe #136
Missouri State, Springfield #74
Arkansas State, Jonesboro #180
UL-Lafayette, Lafayette #123

basketball schools:
UTA, Dallas #4
TAMU-CC, Corpus Christi #129
Oral Roberts, Tulsa #61
Wichita State, Wichita #69

Now, schools like Texas State, UTA, La Tech, UCA and Oral Roberts or either on the edge of the DMA or share it with more popular schools or pro sports. But you still have a lot of good sized markets (that are growing) that the potential for a good TV package is possible from the get-go.

I think for something like this to work is if these schools did a lot of planning before they actually broke away to form a new conference. Wichita State and MO State make good money from the MVC, so they probably wouldn't make the jump unless they were serious about FBS football and knew this new conference would make money in basketball. The same with La Tech, the WAC makes them good money, so they too would need to know there was money to be made in this new conference.

I doubt this would happen but it's fun to think about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 376 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Quinn and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Looking for College Sports apparel? Support our partner:







Support Our Partners: Search Engine Marketing - Search Engine Optimization - Search Engine Training - Online Marketing for Restuarants

Subway Map Shirts - Food and Travel

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group